Signatories

The primary signatory list now lives on the homepage below the declaration text.

3134 Signatories
  1. Nicola Ciccoli ORCID University of Perugia
  2. Christian Clason ORCID Professor of Mathematical Optimization, Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz
  3. Zhihua Chen verified email KTH Royal Institute of Technology
  4. Frits Spieksma ORCID Mathematics and Computer Science, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven
  5. Enrique Alvarez Vazquez ORCID Researcher, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
  6. Pierre Vandenhove ORCID Université de Mons
  7. Marc Corstanje ORCID Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
  8. C. S. Rajan verified email Ashoka University
  9. Jeffrey Harvey ORCID Professor, University of Chicago
  10. Iqra Altaf ORCID Postdoc, UCLA.
  11. Simone Castellan ORCID Università degli studi di Parma
  12. Nicky Hekster ORCID Executive Professor, TIAS School for Business and Society
  13. Matthias Eberhardt
  14. Detlef Steuer ORCID Helmut-Schmidt-Universität Hamburg
  15. Katherine E. Stange ORCID Full Professor, University of Colorado Boulder
  16. Veronica Calvo Cortes ORCID PhD Researcher, Max Planck Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences
  17. Gerhard Weiss ORCID Professor, Maastricht University
  18. Yuhan Chi ORCID Fudan University
  19. Daniel Estévez ORCID Independent researcher
  20. Marco Streng ORCID Universiteit Leiden
  21. Stephane Mallat verified email Collège de France
  22. David Trillo ORCID
  23. Sife Shuo Wang ORCID
  24. Kim Batselier ORCID Delft University of Technology
  25. Arsham Mikaeili Namini ORCID McGill University
  26. Felipe Ponce-Vanegas ORCID Postdoc Fellow, Basque Center for Applied Mathematics
    Comment

    I am optimistic about the positive impact of AI on mathematics, and this includes making us rethink our role as mathematicians in society. But to move forward, it is important to identify and mitigate potential threats, such as impaired creativity because AI pushes us toward its own patterns of reasoning. This declaration brings up essential topics the community should address. [post written with assistance of ChatGPT to sound like a native speaker.]

  27. Innocent Maposa ORCID Dr, Stellenbosch University
    Comment

    I agree with the declaration

  28. Vandana Dwarka verified email Delft University of Technology
  29. Rogier Bos ORCID Assistant professor, Universiteit Utrecht
  30. Alexander Müller-Hermes verified email University of Oslo
  31. Alon Dogon ORCID PhD Student, Weizmann Institute of Science
  32. Christian Furrer ORCID Københavns Universitet
  33. Florian Metzger ORCID Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg
  34. Lorenzo Fantini ORCID École polytechnique
  35. Su Gao ORCID University Chair Professor, Nankai University
    Comment

    The Leiden Declaration comes at the right time and provides much needed recommendations to individual mathematicians, organizations and policy makers. I wholeheartedly endorse the recommendations in the Declaration. I view this as a great start -- now that we have found some sense of directions, the next step is for the mathematics community to take collective actions to maintain the integerity of mathematics as a human endeavor.

  36. Peter Bruin ORCID Universitair hoofddocent (associate professor), Universiteit Leiden
  37. Ruihua Wang ORCID Lecturer, Hainan Bielefeld University of Applied Sciences
  38. Lorenzo Clemente ORCID
  39. Leslie Ann Goldberg ORCID University of Oxford
  40. MAURICE J DUPRE verified email Tulane University
    Comment

    MATHEMATICS (My definition don’t blame anyone else): The ART of CREATING WAYS to HANDLE INFORMATION. As such, there are no rules other than those desired by Mathematicians to accomplish whatever purpose they have in mind. All living things must handle the information from their environment for survival. Except for humans, the WAYS are provided by evolution. Human requirements have outstripped evolution so all humans are forced to become Mathematicians. However, most use methods of little interest to others. Professional Mathematicians on the other hand develop ways which can be of wider interest. Computers only follow rules and algorithms, so even with AI are not at this time really doing mathematics, but simply a very complex version of calculation, and If they get to the level of GAI with human level AI, then the mathematics they produce is not guaranteed to be of interest to humans, and suffers from all the issues detailed in the LEIDEN DECLARATION, many of which are clearly dangerous.

  41. Gentian Zavalani ORCID PhD students, Scientists, CASUS Center for Advanced System Understanding
  42. Fabio Mogavero ORCID Associate Professor of Computer Science, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II
  43. Leo van Iersel ORCID TU Delft
  44. Maurizio Grasselli ORCID Politecnico di Milano
  45. Felix Lotter ORCID PhD Student, Max Planck Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences
  46. Jordi-Lluís Figueras Romero ORCID Uppsala University
  47. Jaclyn Lang ORCID Assistant Professor, Temple University
  48. Jörn Hatzky ORCID Researcher, QPS (Netherlands)
  49. Anh-Chi Tuan ORCID MSc student - Politecnico di Milano
  50. Gianluca Garello ORCID Associate professor, Università di Torino
  51. Stephen Preston ORCID Professor, CUNY Brooklyn College and Graduate Center
  52. Gian Maria Dall'Ara ORCID Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Istituto Nazionale di Alta Matematica "Francesco Severi"
  53. Natalie Packham ORCID Professor of Mathematics and Statistics, Berlin School of Economics and Law
  54. Moses Boudourides ORCID Northwestern University
    Comment

    I have signed the Leiden Declaration on AI in Research because I believe that artificial intelligence should strengthen, rather than replace, the fundamental principles of scholarship. As a researcher working at the intersection of network science, computational social science, and AI-assisted methodologies, I view AI as a powerful tool for discovery, synthesis, and scientific productivity. At the same time, scientific responsibility, intellectual accountability, transparency, reproducibility, and critical judgment remain irreducibly human responsibilities. The challenge before us is not whether AI should be used in research, but how it should be used. The future of science will be shaped not by a choice between humans and AI, but by thoughtful collaborations that combine computational capabilities with human understanding, creativity, and ethical responsibility. I therefore support the Leiden Declaration's call for preserving the values of scholarly inquiry while embracing the opportunities created by rapidly advancing AI technologies.

  55. Tom de Jong ORCID University of Nottingham
    Comment

    While the recommendations may be underwhelming and prove insufficient, I consider the declaration's identification and description of values and threats to be urgent and valuable.

  56. Michel Verhaegen ORCID Emeritus Professor TU Delft
  57. Enrique Pardo ORCID Full Professor, Universidad de Cádiz
  58. William Waites ORCID Senior Research Fellow, University of Edinburgh
  59. Henrik Kreidler ORCID PostDoc, Leipzig University
  60. Bart Smets ORCID Eindhoven University of Technology
    Comment

    A reasonable and balanced approach to adapting ourselves to what is, in the end, just another new tool.

  61. Kaiyi Zhang ORCID Tsinghua University
    Comment

    A new era of human-AI collaboration in mathematical research has truly arrived. It is foreseeable that AI will continue to evolve. Friends, embrace the change!

  62. Wenyong Zhou verified email Fudan University
    Comment

    Humans must restrict the development and application of AI, and it is best to design a clear framework. I believe this kind of restriction applies not only in the field of mathematics but across all domains.

  63. Betul Tanbay Bogazici University, Professor - Chair of the International Day of Mathematics (IDM)
    Comment

    given the times we live in, where universal values are strongly shaken, mathematics turns out to be the most universal and valid asset humanity has created. Assuming the responsibility of having created the "machines", it is the duty of all mathematicians to be extremely aware of the capacity of AI and reflect continuously about its limits. Mathematicians should learn and teach more about the works of people like Gödel, Tarski, Church. Mathematics departments should interact more with language and philosophy departments. They should be involved in the development of the language used for humans versus the machines. The term "human mathematician" is a pleonasm and should disappear before it spreads. Only human beings can be mathematicians as only human beings can be philosophers.

  64. Jinxi Zhang verified email King's College London, University of London
  65. Aalok Thakkar verified email Ashoka University
  66. José A. Alonso verified email Universidad de Sevilla
  67. Ronny Bergmann ORCID Associate Professor, Department of Mathematical Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
  68. Sakshee Singh BHU
  69. Xiangfei Li ORCID Suzhou High School of Jiangsu Province
  70. Niels Lindner ORCID Freie Universität Berlin
  71. Isaac Meilijson ORCID Faculty Of Exact Sciences, Tel Aviv University
  72. Manuel Blickle ORCID Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
  73. Floris Vermeulen ORCID University of Münster
  74. Rahul Vishwakarma ORCID WorkOnward
  75. Yulin Chen verified email University of Science and Technology Beijing
  76. Henk Mulder ORCID Researcher, Independent
  77. Ankita Sharma verified email Imperial College London
  78. Kapil Paranjape ORCID Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Mohali
    Comment

    A much needed document. As Jacobi said, "The object of mathematics is the honor of the human spirit." One of the serious problems with technological tools is that such tools can reduce human agency. Another risk is that we become unwitting participants in an advertising campaign.

  79. Sheung-Yu Pau
  80. Herries Arime ORCID Student in Monash University, who interested in the philosophy of technology and AI ethics
  81. Igor van gemert Thelastconsultant.pro
    Comment

    Relevant article so sharing and supporting

  82. zee may ORCID tibet university
  83. Ulrike Grömping ORCID FB II, Berliner Hochschule für Technik
  84. Madhukar Anand PhD Computer and Information Sciences, Mathematics Major.
    Comment

    The declaration brings much needed clarity on guidelines and recommendations to address the challenges posed by the use of AI. We need a similar one for Computer Science and Software Development

  85. Chongchuo Li ORCID
  86. Yansheng zuo DOIT (China) Investment CO.,LTD
    Comment

    AI should serve our people, not dominate our people. We need a world safety framework for AI architecture right now.

  87. Roland Cristopher Caballar ORCID Assistant Professor, University of Santo Tomas
    Comment

    May AI be a tool to advance understanding of mathematics and push the frontiers of knowledge ever onward, not a machine that constrains our mathematical understanding and puts limits on what we can know.

  88. Luna Xin ORCID Bachelor, University of Waterloo
  89. 浩宇 陈 ORCID Nanjing University
  90. Ambros Gleixner verified email Hochschule für Technik und Wirtschaft Berlin
  91. Manjunath Krishnapur verified email Indian Institute of Science
  92. Wojciech Gajda ORCID Professor, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań
  93. Yiming Wu Undergraduate student in Engineering
    Comment

    As a student,I wholeheartedly endorse this declaration and hope that AI will make even greater contributions to mathematics and the advancement of humanity.

  94. Kenny De Commer ORCID Hoogleraar (professor), Vrije Universiteit Brussel
  95. Peihan Wu ORCID Sichuan University
    Comment

    The majority of the essence of this declaration is of utmost importance.

  96. Andrzej Blikle ORCID Professor, Institute of Computer Science Polish Academy of Sciences
  97. Rowyn Boyd
  98. Zhenyu Cao ORCID Student, Hunan University of Humanities, Science and Technology
  99. Zhuo Chen ORCID School of Mathematical Sciences, East China Normal University
  100. Yang Qiu ORCID Cornell University