Signatories

The primary signatory list now lives on the homepage below the declaration text.

3958 Signatories
  1. Silvia De Toffoli ORCID Associate Professor, University School for Advanced Studies - IUSS Pavia
  2. Igor Zelenko ORCID Professor, Texas A&M University
  3. Leonard TODJIHOUNDE ORCID
  4. KEITH KEARNES ORCID University of Colorado Boulder
  5. Prof. Ansh Patra ORCID Theorist, Royal Society
  6. Audace Amen Vioutou Dossou-Olory ORCID
  7. Nathan Derhake ORCID PhD Student, Georgia Institute of Technology
  8. Salimou Gassama ORCID
  9. Gautam Iyer ORCID Professor, Carnegie Mellon University
  10. Adrien Morin ORCID Maître de conférences, Université de Limoges
  11. Fahad Shihab ORCID Senior Systems Engineer, Indian Institute of Science Bangalore
  12. Mathieu Giroux ORCID Columbia University
  13. Amirhosein Heidarian ORCID
  14. Luca Ferrigno ORCID Université Clermont Auvergne
  15. Silvan Horvath ORCID ETH Zürich
  16. Christian Korff ORCID Professor of Mathematical Physics, University of Glasgow
  17. Claude-Michel Brauner ORCID Professor Emeritus, Université de Bordeaux
  18. William Daniel Stephenson ORCID University of Ottawa
  19. Dell Zhang ORCID Chief Scientist, XSci
  20. János Marcell Benke ORCID University of Szeged
  21. Paul Goldberg ORCID Reuben College; Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford
  22. Michael Reitmeir ORCID University of Bonn
  23. Sihyun Song ORCID Yonsei University
  24. Bernhard Keller ORCID Universtié Paris Cité
  25. Erin Schwertner-Watson verified email University of New Mexico
  26. António Machiavelo ORCID Department of Mathematics, University of Porto, Portugal
  27. Hyungmin Jang ORCID department of mathematics, Yonsei University
  28. Dominick Range ORCID Academic Researcher, University of California, Santa Cruz
  29. Radoslav Harman ORCID Prof., Comenius University
  30. Soumya Dey ORCID Krea University, India
  31. SAUNAK BHATTACHARJEE ORCID PhD Candidate, UNSW Sydney
  32. Christian Risco ORCID The University of Queensland
  33. Cesare Borgia ORCID Student, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
  34. Anthony Rossi ORCID Lucerne University of Applied Sciences and Arts
  35. Jeanine Van Order ORCID
  36. Gabriel Bonuccelli Heringer Lisboa ORCID Master's student, Universidade de São Paulo
  37. Gábor Pete ORCID Alfréd Rényi Institute of Mathematics
  38. Yaxin Tu ORCID Doctoral, Princeton University
  39. Maria Cristina Pereyra ORCID Professor, University of New Mexico
  40. Matthew Powell ORCID Rice University
  41. Lizhen Zhang ORCID post doc., McGill University
  42. Giovanni Interdonato ORCID Scuola Normale Superiore
  43. Mengwu Guo ORCID Associate Professor, Lund University
  44. Nathanael Pribady ORCID Doctoral Researcher, University of Calgary
  45. Matthew Salter Mathematical Association of America
  46. Carlo Cossu Directeur de recherche, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), France
  47. Ward Nijhuis verified email University of Amsterdam
  48. Yan Xuan ORCID Math, Boston University
  49. Alexander Korbonits ORCID
  50. Peter Goetz ORCID Professor, Cal Poly Humboldt
  51. Volodymyr Nekrashevych ORCID Professor, Texas A&M University
  52. Javier de Lucas ORCID Associate Professor, University of Warsaw
  53. Mentzelos Melistas ORCID University of Twente
  54. Fabrizio Del Monte ORCID Assistant Professor, University of Birmingham
  55. Shaowu Zhang ORCID PMA, California Institute of Technology
  56. Ioan ROXIN ORCID Professeur émérite, Université Marie et Louis Pasteur (Université de Franche-Comté)
  57. Subhadip Chowdhury ORCID University of Chicago
  58. Andor Lukacs ORCID Lect. Dr., Universitatea Babeş-Bolyai
  59. Karen Gunderson ORCID University of Manitoba
  60. Marcus Waurick ORCID University Professor; Chair for Partial Differential Equations, TU Bergakademie Freiberg
    Comment

    The recent developments concerning the Navier—Stokes millennium problem have shown that this declaration is dearly needed and adhering to it is required by all bodies mentioned. Indeed, not so much an apparent solution (as of now still pending peer-scrutiny) of one of the Clay problems but rather the discussion that came with it show the complicated entanglement of mathematical research, personal interests, the question of resources and the tendency of AI companies being potentially problematic as being more or less commercial interest led endeavours in the whole discourse that is the centre of this declaration. Hence, I wholeheartedly signed this declaration.

  61. Shayaan Emran verified email Johns Hopkins University
  62. Sug Woo Shin ORCID UC Berkeley
  63. John S. Nolan ORCID Visiting Assistant Professor, The Ohio State University
  64. Eduardo Souza Fraga ORCID Full Professor, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
  65. Konstantinos Avgerakis verified email Technische Universität München
  66. Gabriel Soto ORCID Profesor Titular, Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia San Juan Bosco
  67. Diogo Arsénio ORCID New York University
  68. Paula Truöl ORCID Postdoc, University of Glasgow
  69. Maxine Calle ORCID HCM postdoctoral scholar, University of Bonn
  70. Michael Wallner ORCID TU Wien
  71. Federico Vigolo ORCID Junior Professor, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen
  72. Joel Pulikkan verified email Rutgers University
    Comment

    The future will wish they had lived in the past.

  73. Shubham Sinha ORCID Postdoctoral Fellow, University of British Columbia
  74. Dipramit Majumdar ORCID Indian Institute of Technology Madras
  75. Jaco Ruit ORCID Postdoctoral fellow, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
  76. William Sheppard ORCID University of California, Santa Barbara
  77. Assad Oberai ORCID Professor, University of Southern California
  78. Emilio Annoni ORCID Quandela (France)
  79. Nathan Hayes ORCID PhD, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
  80. Andrew Robinson ORCID Professor, University of Melbourne
  81. Woo Young Lee ORCID Professor Emeritus, Seoul National University
    Comment

    Upon hearing the news that AI model solved the Navier-Stokes Millennium problem: Why do we devote ourselves to solving the long-standing open problems ? Is it the solution itself that truly matters, or is it the journey—the experience of roaming freely through the world of thought? We may find an answer in the following words from Morris Kline’s foreword to Bertrand Russell’s celebrated book <An Essay on the Foundations of Geometry>: “The insolvable problems continually entice the human mind and the greatest intellectual pleasures are derived from the constant striving after elusive truth. The works of great minds keep the problems before our eyes and prevent us from sinking into mental lethargy.“ Indeed, the true meaning of mathematics lies in keeping the human spirit awake.

  82. François Lalonde Université du Québec à Montréal
  83. Patrick Gambill verified email Washington State University
  84. Alex Dunbar ORCID Hale Visiting Assistant Professor, Georgia Institute of Technology
  85. Thomas Nikolaus ORCID Professor, University of Münster
  86. Kevin Gomez ORCID Tandon School of Engineering, New York University
  87. Amaury Lambert ORCID Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris, France
  88. Takis Konstantopoulos Professor of Mathematics, University of Liverpool
    Comment

    1) Mathematics has traditionally been one of the most democratic intellectual activities. Talent, curiosity, and hard work matter far more than wealth or status. AI risks changing this. If access to the best mathematical tools depends on the ability to pay, then economic privilege becomes a significant advantage. The mathematical community should explicitly RESIST A FUTURE IN WHICH ACCESS TO MATHEMATICAL INQUIRY IS DETERMINED BY WEALTH. 2) AI use by beginners deserves caution. Effective prompting, evaluation of answers, and detection of errors require mathematical expertise that most students do not yet possess. For them, AI can encourage dependency and superficial understanding rather than genuine learning. Universities should be more critical of claims that AI is universally beneficial in mathematics education. 3) AI can be a useful encyclopedic aid, but successful use presupposes prior mathematical experience. Without a solid foundation, users may be unable to distinguish insight from plausible-sounding error. 4) AI can only be as good as the material on which it is trained. It performs best in areas with strong traditions of rigor and worst where low-quality work is common. A serious concern is a feedback loop: poor material produces more poor material. Garbage in, garbage out. Today's systems draw on centuries of carefully accumulated mathematical knowledge. Will future systems be able to say the same? 5) Mathematics is not primarily about obtaining answers. It is about achieving UNDERSTANDING. A proof is valuable because it provides insight and explanation, not merely because it establishes truth. Papers should communicate human understanding, not merely machine output. AUTHORSHIP AND RESPONSIBILITY MUST REMAIN HUMAN, EVEN WHEN AI HAS BEEN USED AS A TOOL.

  89. Dario Faro ORCID Università degli Studi di Milano
  90. Noel Arteche ORCID Doctoral student, Lund University
  91. Ioan Marcut ORCID Professor, University of Cologne
  92. Christopher Deninger verified email Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster
  93. Olivier Faugeras ORCID Emeritus Researcher, Inria Centre de Recherche Sophia Antipolis Méditerranée
  94. Jan-Willem van Ittersum ORCID Postdoc, University of Amsterdam
  95. Paulo Carvalho ORCID Associate Professor, Universidade do Minho
  96. Aleksandr Trufanov verified email Université de Montréal
  97. Jacopo De Simoi verified email University of Toronto
  98. Tae-Geun Kim ORCID Postdoctoral Researcher, Fudan University and RIKEN iTHEMS
  99. (Alex) Jiayi Zhang ORCID PhD Student(Math and Theoretical Physics), Durham University
  100. Shyam Ravishankar ORCID Universität Münster
    Comment

    My interest and active engagement with mathematics is fundamentally because of the people and communities I have been fortunate to interact with. I find little meaning in mathematics without the people who create, explore, debate, and disseminate it; this fundamentally human core cannot be lost.